Re: automated testing comment [Re: time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb?]

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 09/23/2014 02:57 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:30:14 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On testing regressions, indeed you may the only one doing
>> something like that currently.  Is your build/test bot some
>> place public others can look at results?
> 
> Sanimir Agovic asked for results subscription in the past, it had no public
> access so far as I am still waiting till some more "business ran" testing bot
> gets deployed.  So I made accessible what I have now ...

Thanks!

(fyi, http://host2.jankratochvil.net/gdbmail seems to not be working for me atm.)

I think it'd be fine to send the periodic email results/alerts/whatever to:

 https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testresults/

That list hasn't been active in a while, but it's still alive, afaics,
and the point of that list was to collect auto testers' test results.

>> Seems like we should at least have a central place that lists
>> the existing public bots / auto testers.  Like, a wiki page.  :-)
> 
> ... at the wiki page:
> 	https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/BuildBotResults
> 	https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/HomePageDevelopingColumn?action=diff&rev2=33&rev1=32

Awesome, thank you.

>> I saw Jan-Benedict acting on a build regression caught by the
>> build bot here:
>>
>>   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-09/msg00658.html
> 
> OK, great, I see there is running second testbot.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves