From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 497 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2014 08:20:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 486 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2014 08:20:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:20:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8P8KWoR004117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 04:20:32 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8P8KTAv031499; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 04:20:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5423D04D.8000600@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:20:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand , Andreas Arnez CC: Jan Kratochvil , Doug Evans , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: automated testing comment [Re: time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb?] References: <201409241523.s8OFNNjP009931@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201409241523.s8OFNNjP009931@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 On 09/24/2014 04:23 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Andreas Arnez wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23 2014, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> I think it'd be fine to send the periodic email results/alerts/whatever to: >>> >>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testresults/ >>> >>> That list hasn't been active in a while, but it's still alive, afaics, >>> and the point of that list was to collect auto testers' test results. >> >> Interesting. Even before I started working on GDB, Andreas Krebbel had >> set up a bot that sends test results to a different list, and we're >> still continuing to do so: >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/ >> >> Knowing now that there's also gdb-testresults, I wonder whether that >> ever was a good choice. We could certainly change that, so gdb-testers >> is freed up for discussions like this one ;-) > > Well, I guess that would be because the main web page: > https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/mailing-lists/ > says: > > gdb-testers > is a list for the announcement of development snapshots and the reporting of test results. > > and does not mention gdb-testresults at all. > > I think we should agree on one of them, and document it on the web page. Certainly fine with me. I completely missed that we had two lists for this. The only reason I suggested gdb-testresults was that I knew there was a test results mailing list, but, I wasn't subscribed to it, and then when I went looking for the archives url, gdb-testresults was what Firefox url history bar autocompleted. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves