public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't prune program spaces when doing "maintenance info program-spaces"
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542579FA.3040204@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22RYvzm4o0gkgam8-Cy=WAynaM+qZgaERdMJ+UjGSG5U5Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 2014-09-25 03:13 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> On 2014-09-24 10:30 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 24 2014, Doug Evans wrote:
>>>
>>>> IOW, how about move the call to prune_program_spaces to  whatever
>>>> caller wants it.
>>>
>>> As a note, after I commented on the patch, I noticed that the "prune"
>>> argument may be unecessary indeed (and the "prunning" logic"), because
>>> we are not prunning anything anymore.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I just wanted to say that I agree with removing this part of the
>>> code, and moving it to more suitable parts.
>>
>> Fine with me. Here is the updated patch, much simpler now.
>>
>> gdb/Changelog:
>>
>>         * progspace.c (print_program_space): Don't prune program spaces
>>         before printing them.
> 
> LGTM
> 
> In the commit log I would add a note that this was removed so that the
> print routine didn't have (unwanted) side-effects.
> 
> Thanks.

Pushed, thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-26 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-24 18:11 Simon Marchi
2014-09-24 18:53 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-09-24 19:31   ` Simon Marchi
2014-09-24 19:34     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-09-24 22:48 ` Doug Evans
2014-09-25  2:31   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-09-25 14:44     ` Simon Marchi
2014-09-25 19:13       ` Doug Evans
2014-09-26 14:37         ` Simon Marchi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542579FA.3040204@ericsson.com \
    --to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).