From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16275 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2014 17:15:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16255 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2014 17:15:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:15:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB4HF6QB002190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:15:07 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB4HF5B4021985; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:15:06 -0500 Message-ID: <54809699.9010107@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:15:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: small updates on GDB Coding Style wiki References: <20141130063649.GA4882@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20141130063649.GA4882@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 On 11/30/2014 06:36 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > Just FYI - I merged my old "GDB Coding Style Cheat Sheet" wiki page > into the official "GDB C Coding Standard" page, and deleted mine > afterwards. Since the wiki is now the official repository for > documenting our coding standards, I didn't the reason for keeping > my own page. While doing so, I reformatted a bit the original page, > doing the following: > - Added a Table of Contents; > - used subsections to plit each rule or set of rule; > > The objectives where to make it easier to navigate the document when > in search of a specific rule. I also wanted to separte each rule more > so that one small but important rule does not get drown between other > rules, and therefore missed. Thanks Joel. Pedro Alves