From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/Linux] Ask kernel to kill inferior when GDB terminates
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548F4FFC.8060509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141215204323.GE5457@adacore.com>
On 12/15/2014 08:43 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> GDB with signal 9. After GDB is killed, the inferior still remains
> in "interruptible sleep (waiting for an event to complete)" state.
This makes it sound like "interruptible sleep" is some kind of wedged
state waiting for a debugger. But, this simply means your process is just
running as normal, and your test's case, normal means idling. Most likely,
your test program had a "sleep" call in it. IOW, it'd be in sleep state
even if had been started outside gdb. Another test program could go
to "T (stopped)", "R (running)", etc.
> -/* Determine ptrace features available on this target. */
> +/* Determine ptrace features available on this target.
> + ATTACHED should be nonzero iff we've attached to the inferior. */
>
> static void
> -linux_check_ptrace_features (void)
> +linux_check_ptrace_features (int attached)
> {
> int child_pid, ret, status;
>
> @@ -338,6 +340,9 @@ linux_check_ptrace_features (void)
>
> linux_test_for_tracefork (child_pid);
>
> + if (!attached)
> + linux_test_for_exitkill (child_pid);
This test must be called unconditionally. current_ptrace_options is
only initialized once:
void
linux_enable_event_reporting (pid_t pid)
{
/* Check if we have initialized the ptrace features for this
target. If not, do it now. */
if (current_ptrace_options == -1)
linux_check_ptrace_features ();
so if the first process gdbserver debugs is an "attach" process,
but the second one is not, you'll miss setting PTRACE_O_EXITKILL on
the second process.
Instead, always call linux_test_for_exitkill, and then in
linux_enable_event_reporting mask out PTRACE_O_EXITKILL
from current_ptrace_options if 'attached' is false.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-15 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-14 16:54 Joel Brobecker
2014-11-14 17:09 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-14 17:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-11-19 9:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-11-19 9:58 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-13 16:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-15 13:22 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-15 20:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-15 21:17 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-12-16 0:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-16 9:46 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-16 12:58 ` pushed: " Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548F4FFC.8060509@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).