Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 12/18/2014 08:56 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com] 
> On 10/17/2014 08:22 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> 
>> Gdb.base gdb testsuite is run and here is the status of gdb testsuite run for gdb.base.
>>
>>                 === gdb Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes            7804
>> # of unexpected failures        2263
> 
>>> Over 2000 unexpected failures is not very reassuring though.
>>> Have you looked at the logs to get an idea of what might be broken?
> 
> We have looked at the log files for the failures. Here are the main categories of the failure.
> 
> 1. push_dummy_code is not implemented for Micro blaze port  due to this  there are 350+ failures.

Eh, no inferior function call support.  Are you planning on
implementing this?

You can set gdb,cannot_call_functions in your board file to
skip the affected tests meanwhile.

> 2.  Failures for signals is around 357.

What sort of failures?

> 3. Watch point  failures are around 817.

Set gdb,no_hardware_watchpoints in the board file.

> 
> Main total categories of the failure = 376 + 357 + 817 =  1550.
> 
> These failures are not because of  gdbserver patch and they seem to exist prior to this patch. 

Thanks,
Pedro Alves