From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16734 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2014 16:10:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16526 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2014 16:10:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: homiemail-a56.g.dreamhost.com Received: from sub5.mail.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a56.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.129) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:10:20 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a56.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a56.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753B6FE064; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from redwood.eagercon.com (c-24-7-16-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.7.16.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eager@eagerm.com) by homiemail-a56.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36884FE05B; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:10:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5492FC6A.7040001@eagerm.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:10:00 -0000 From: Michael Eager User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal , Michael Eager , Pedro Alves , Joel Brobecker CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Vinod Kathail , Vidhumouli Hunsigida , Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver References: <25de23b98e054fd291ea232d10f2800c@BN1BFFO11FD018.protection.gbl> <5436B7D0.9060004@eagercon.com> <543E7630.5060001@redhat.com> <99de529c620a4bb0a118a9fc39ae6ad0@BY2FFO11FD008.protection.gbl> <548F2240.7020700@redhat.com> <548F24CA.7090503@eagercon.com> <03105cda11564e60a2ef365cbe36688e@BY2FFO11FD023.protection.gbl> In-Reply-To: <03105cda11564e60a2ef365cbe36688e@BY2FFO11FD023.protection.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 On 12/18/14 00:58, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Eager [mailto:eager@eagercon.com] > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 11:44 PM > To: Pedro Alves; Ajit Kumar Agarwal; Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Vinod Kathail; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala > Subject: Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver > > On 12/15/14 10:02, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 10/17/2014 08:22 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote: >> >>> Gdb.base gdb testsuite is run and here is the status of gdb testsuite run for gdb.base. >>> >>> === gdb Summary === >>> >>> # of expected passes 7804 >>> # of unexpected failures 2263 >> >> Over 2000 unexpected failures is not very reassuring though. >> Have you looked at the logs to get an idea of what might be broken? > >>> Bare metal test results show ~350 failures. The gdbserver results should be similar. > > push_dummy_code feature is not implemented in Microblaze port. > The total failure due to this functionality is 592 in bare metal. Of this gdb.base failures are 357. > > May we know what you meant by ~350 failures. Sorry, I was looking at GCC failures. Running gdb regression test on bare metal gives the following: # of expected passes 6481 # of unexpected failures 1053 # of expected failures 6 # of known failures 21 # of unresolved testcases 12 # of untested testcases 31 # of unsupported tests 21 That's 1053 failures, compared to the 2263 using gdbserver. -- Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077