From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14754 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2015 10:55:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14729 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2015 10:55:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t09AtU8n030272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 05:55:30 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t09AtQIr023131; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 05:55:29 -0500 Message-ID: <54AFB39D.9090109@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller , "'gdb-patches'" CC: gpc@gnu.de Subject: Re: gdb-patches RFA: Fix pascal behavior for class fields References: <54ae4586.01e3440a.7b06.fffff844SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <54AE605A.8050308@redhat.com> <54ae7f9f.c323460a.36ed.ffffff30SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <54AE8914.4010507@redhat.com> <54ae911b.85e3440a.1d96.5ffdSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <54AFB2E5.5080307@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54AFB2E5.5080307@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 On 01/09/2015 10:52 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > There may be a more generic and common name for the mode, > like "obj-pascal" or something, but I wouldn't know. To clarify, I meant, it is my impression that objfpc is a dialect of Object Pascal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_Pascal Thanks, Pedro Alves