From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21457 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2015 11:18:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21429 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2015 11:18:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:18:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0MBITCD021504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:18:29 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0MBIRD7005427; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:18:28 -0500 Message-ID: <54C0DC83.20401@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:18:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans , Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches Subject: Re: [patchv2] Sort threads for thread apply all (bt) References: <20150115183316.GA16405@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20150116233802.GA8732@host2.jankratochvil.net> <21696.17350.451535.337528@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <21696.17350.451535.337528@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 With http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16445 in mind, should we add a counterpart option to explicitly force descending order at the same time, so we're a bit more free to change the default order at some point? Thanks, Pedro Alves