From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13596 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2015 16:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13568 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2015 16:42:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:42:50 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1YEhJl-0005O4-Ne from Don_Breazeal@mentor.com ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:42:45 -0800 Received: from [172.30.3.190] (147.34.91.1) by SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:42:45 -0800 Message-ID: <54C27A00.9040502@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:18:00 -0000 From: "Breazeal, Don" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves , "Breazeal, Don" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16 v3] Extended-remote Linux follow fork References: <1408580964-27916-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <1414798134-11536-4-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <5464AB62.5040100@redhat.com> <5464FE11.1080001@codesourcery.com> <5464FF7D.6060103@redhat.com> <5465012C.9060708@codesourcery.com> <54824E47.7020907@codesourcery.com> <54C236B9.8060200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54C236B9.8060200@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00657.txt.bz2 On 1/23/2015 3:55 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi Don, > > I need to play with this in order to review it, and so > I'm trying to reconstruct the current series in my sandbox, but > I'm having troubling figuring out the pieces. Do you keep > the updated series in a branch somewhere? > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves > Hi Pedro, Sorry the currently posted stuff isn't working for you. My most recent merge from upstream, yesterday, resulted in some conflicts and broke some things like follow-vfork. You would probably run into the same conflicts if I posted an older (working) version. I will post a new version of the follow-fork part of the patch series as soon as I work through the merge issue(s). Thanks, --Don