From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9331 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 14:19:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9311 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:19:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t13EIr6Q006884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:18:54 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t13EIpeW006777; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:18:52 -0500 Message-ID: <54D0D8CB.7000509@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:19:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , Andreas Arnez CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 0/3] Fix for PR 17808 and some related changes References: <87vbjp60kw.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <20150202035001.GH4525@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150202035001.GH4525@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 On 02/02/2015 04:50 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:58:07PM +0100, Andreas Arnez wrote: >> Ping: >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00424.html >> >> Pedro commented already, as shown below. Mark has not replied so far. >> >> Note that the PR is on the TODO list for 7.9. In my opinion at least >> patch 1 should go in 7.9; it's fairly harmless and should fix the PR. >> Patch 2 fixes a similar problem, but there might be a test gap, because >> I currently don't have access to appropriate test hardware (with AVX and >> AVX-512). And with patch 3 there's a slight chance of introducing bogus >> warnings when reading core files. Thus I'd suggest to push all three >> patches upstream, but only patch 1 into 7.9. OK? > > Let's give it another week for additional comments (or request for > more time to review), and then push it to master. > > For 7.9, let's confirm your assessment with Pedro. It sounds pretty > good to me. > Sounds good to me, but I have a counter proposal. How about we push it all to master now? That'd give it exposure on both auto testers and on others' machines immediately. We can always address any additional comments as follow ups, of course. The main difference is that the series would be exposed to testing one extra week. Then if we see no fall out, we'd have a little more confidence pushing to 7.9. Thanks, Pedro Alves