From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18003 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 14:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17987 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2015 14:24:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:24:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t13EOhap001882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:24:43 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t13EOfW4000798; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:24:42 -0500 Message-ID: <54D0DA28.9080500@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:24:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , Doug Evans CC: gdb-patches , Phil Muldoon , arnez@vnet.linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: GDB 7.9 release update References: <20150127043704.GB4697@adacore.com> <20150129045344.GC5193@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150129045344.GC5193@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 On 01/29/2015 05:53 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I am also wondering if we should also wait for... > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17837 ... or not. > Pedro, I see you've been kind enough to start looking into this > (bugzilla papertrail). What do you think? Blocker, not blocker? I'm not sure. I haven't fully understood what the scripts in question are doing and how the issue triggers. I've asked Jan if he could come up with a simplified reproducer. Hopefully we'll have a better idea soon. There was also this: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00703.html The issue there is that with both remote and record targets, GDB can get messed up after 'query'. That's a regression compared to 7.8. I think I'll go push that series to master ASAP. I'll wait for feedback on the plan before pushing into 7.9 though. Thanks, Pedro Alves