From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-119543-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4032 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 17:52:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 4022 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2015 17:52:47 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:52:45 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t13Hqe03004961	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:52:40 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t13Hqc7G022161;	Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:52:39 -0500
Message-ID: <54D10AE6.8080500@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:52:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up "gdb -tui" output
References: <83zj9v7urq.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22Q7oD3K-dYkngEPDBbV++mLCKifTEmvJczQ=0h2FX0yXA@mail.gmail.com> <83sifn7mpt.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22QeiSrzD81kMJeqpnDBrx1DybpbGmHc1r0koGDtqAu8tw@mail.gmail.com> <83h9w278a9.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22R_=xwonUGJMxJRtAbbK8OcSmU5ojarB=T9wjg9YEtE6Q@mail.gmail.com> <83bnma75yt.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22SvEa8-+y009ET7PQDuYixGEK6LbrJr_pyQ98SfVy_iJg@mail.gmail.com> <837fwy74ny.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22QZ8qgfYfsT=wxQg8yKRE3EzPTc8QHcHpk8oXpA6DsA2A@mail.gmail.com> <21677.44074.982761.250152@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <83iog2y7s9.fsf@gnu.org> <CAP9bCMQ82dTHdN-w8hACOYGcus6oaMNNWpAhpQtLFhT4fnbQ5w@mail.gmail.com> <83vbjnjpfb.fsf@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <83vbjnjpfb.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2

On 01/31/2015 09:59 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:32:48 -0800
>> From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>

>> I don't have a preference on which, with one condition.
>> If we're going to remove the fflush's let's do it as a separate patch.

I'll do that.

> Ping!  Can one of these patches be committed, please, master and the
> 7.9 branch?

Sorry for the radio silence; I was traveling last week.

I'm working on this now.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves