From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108409 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2015 13:15:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108394 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2015 13:15:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:15:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2BDFQa6007549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:15:27 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2BDFNa5026733; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:15:26 -0400 Message-ID: <55003FEB.40004@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:15:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Benson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] Implement remote_bfd_iovec_stat References: <55002568.1050305@redhat.com> <1426078708-3044-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1426078708-3044-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 On 03/11/2015 12:58 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 03/11/2015 10:23 AM, Gary Benson wrote: >>> Are you ok for me to commit this patch, reordered before the >>> gdbserver changes, with extract_unsigned_integer used in >>> remote_fileio_to_host_{uint,ulong}, and that comment added? >> >> It be easier for me to just see the patch before answering, but I >> think I am, though I'd like to take another look at the docs patch >> with everything combined, to cross check whether more bits would be >> missing. > > Ok, here goes: Thanks. Looks good to me. Pedro Alves