From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] section_table_xfer_memory: Replace section name with callback predicate
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:33:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550ef44f-7b41-d999-fe58-b1fbc73f4403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513171155.645761-4-kevinb@redhat.com>
On 5/13/20 6:11 PM, Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches wrote:
> This patch is motivated by the need to be able to select sections
> that section_table_xfer_memory_partial should consider for memory
> transfers. I'll use this facility in the next patch in this series.
>
> section_table_xfer_memory_partial() can currently be passed a section
> name which may be used to make name-based selections. This is similar
> to what I want to do, except that I want to be able to consider
> section flags instead of the name.
>
> I'm replacing the section name parameter with a predicate that,
> when passed a pointer to a target_section struct, will return
> true if that section should be further considered, or false which
> indicates that it shouldn't.
>
> I've converted the one existing use where a non-NULL section
> name is passed to section_table_xfer_memory_partial(). Instead
> of passing the section name, it now looks like this:
>
> auto match_cb = [&] (const struct target_section *s)
> {
> return (strcmp (section_name, s->the_bfd_section->name) == 0);
> };
>
> return section_table_xfer_memory_partial (readbuf, writebuf,
> memaddr, len, xfered_len,
> table->sections,
> table->sections_end,
> match_cb);
>
> The other callers all passed NULL; they've been simplified somewhat
> in that they no longer need to pass NULL.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * exec.h (section_table_xfer_memory): Revise declaration,
> replacing section name parameter with an optional callback
> predicate.
> * exec.c (section_table_xfer_memory): Likewise.
> * bfd-target.c, exec.c, target.c, corelow.c: Adjust all callers
> of section_table_xfer_memory.
> ---
> gdb/bfd-target.c | 3 +--
> gdb/corelow.c | 3 +--
> gdb/exec.c | 8 ++++----
> gdb/exec.h | 13 ++++++++++---
> gdb/target.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/bfd-target.c b/gdb/bfd-target.c
> index b75abd7fb0..3d266951c5 100644
> --- a/gdb/bfd-target.c
> +++ b/gdb/bfd-target.c
> @@ -77,8 +77,7 @@ target_bfd::xfer_partial (target_object object,
> return section_table_xfer_memory_partial (readbuf, writebuf,
> offset, len, xfered_len,
> m_table.sections,
> - m_table.sections_end,
> - NULL);
> + m_table.sections_end);
> }
> default:
> return TARGET_XFER_E_IO;
> diff --git a/gdb/corelow.c b/gdb/corelow.c
> index b60010453d..e3bd0bc452 100644
> --- a/gdb/corelow.c
> +++ b/gdb/corelow.c
> @@ -617,8 +617,7 @@ core_target::xfer_partial (enum target_object object, const char *annex,
> (readbuf, writebuf,
> offset, len, xfered_len,
> m_core_section_table.sections,
> - m_core_section_table.sections_end,
> - NULL));
> + m_core_section_table.sections_end));
>
> case TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV:
> if (readbuf)
> diff --git a/gdb/exec.c b/gdb/exec.c
> index a2added5e2..02dd37ed10 100644
> --- a/gdb/exec.c
> +++ b/gdb/exec.c
> @@ -908,7 +908,8 @@ section_table_xfer_memory_partial (gdb_byte *readbuf, const gdb_byte *writebuf,
> ULONGEST *xfered_len,
> struct target_section *sections,
> struct target_section *sections_end,
> - const char *section_name)
> + gdb::function_view<bool
> + (const struct target_section *)> match_cb)
> {
> int res;
> struct target_section *p;
> @@ -922,7 +923,7 @@ section_table_xfer_memory_partial (gdb_byte *readbuf, const gdb_byte *writebuf,
> struct bfd_section *asect = p->the_bfd_section;
> bfd *abfd = asect->owner;
>
> - if (section_name && strcmp (section_name, asect->name) != 0)
> + if (!match_cb (p))
> continue; /* not the section we need. */
> if (memaddr >= p->addr)
> {
> @@ -995,8 +996,7 @@ exec_target::xfer_partial (enum target_object object,
> return section_table_xfer_memory_partial (readbuf, writebuf,
> offset, len, xfered_len,
> table->sections,
> - table->sections_end,
> - NULL);
> + table->sections_end);
> else
> return TARGET_XFER_E_IO;
> }
> diff --git a/gdb/exec.h b/gdb/exec.h
> index 54e6ff4d9b..7057b1be5a 100644
> --- a/gdb/exec.h
> +++ b/gdb/exec.h
> @@ -65,8 +65,13 @@ extern enum target_xfer_status
> Request to transfer up to LEN 8-bit bytes of the target sections
> defined by SECTIONS and SECTIONS_END. The OFFSET specifies the
> starting address.
> - If SECTION_NAME is not NULL, only access sections with that same
> - name.
> +
> + The MATCH_CB predicate is optional; when provided it will be called
> + for each section under consideration. When MATCH_CB evaluates as
> + true, the section remains under consideration; a false result
> + removes it from consideration for performing the memory transfers
> + noted above. See memory_xfer_partial_1() in target.c for an
> + example.
>
> Return the number of bytes actually transfered, or zero when no
> data is available for the requested range.
> @@ -83,7 +88,9 @@ extern enum target_xfer_status
> ULONGEST, ULONGEST, ULONGEST *,
> struct target_section *,
> struct target_section *,
> - const char *);
> + gdb::function_view<bool (
> + const struct target_section *)> match_cb
> + = [] (auto *) { return true; } );
The '(' after bool should go on the next line. I think a default of nullptr,
along with the obvious change in section_table_xfer_memory_partial
is better than this default lambda. Like:
gdb::function_view<bool
(const struct target_section *)> match_cb
= nullptr);
This allows writing code where you can explicitly write "no filter"
just using the convenient nullptr, like:
gdb::function_view<bool (const struct target_section *)>
match_cb = nullptr;
if (whatever)
match_cb = [] (....) { .......; };
section_table_xfer_memory_partial (...., match_cb);
Plus, I suspect is generates less code, not sure the linker
merges all the instances of the lambda generated at each
call site that uses the default.
>
> /* Read from mappable read-only sections of BFD executable files.
> Similar to exec_read_partial_read_only, but return
> diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
> index 6982a806e3..b83da21710 100644
> --- a/gdb/target.c
> +++ b/gdb/target.c
> @@ -1036,11 +1036,17 @@ memory_xfer_partial_1 (struct target_ops *ops, enum target_object object,
> const char *section_name = section->the_bfd_section->name;
>
> memaddr = overlay_mapped_address (memaddr, section);
> +
> + auto match_cb = [&] (const struct target_section *s)
[=] is pedantically cheaper, since you're just copying a pointer,
compared to [&] resulting in a pointer (reference) to pointer.
> + {
> + return (strcmp (section_name, s->the_bfd_section->name) == 0);
> + };
> +
> return section_table_xfer_memory_partial (readbuf, writebuf,
> memaddr, len, xfered_len,
> table->sections,
> table->sections_end,
> - section_name);
> + match_cb);
> }
> }
>
OK otherwise.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 17:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix BZ 25631 - core file memory access problem Kevin Buettner
2020-05-13 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Remove hack for GDB which sets the section size to 0 Kevin Buettner
2020-05-13 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] Adjust corefile.exp test to show regression after bfd hack removal Kevin Buettner
2020-05-20 16:24 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-13 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] section_table_xfer_memory: Replace section name with callback predicate Kevin Buettner
2020-05-20 16:33 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2020-05-13 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Provide access to non SEC_HAS_CONTENTS core file sections Kevin Buettner
2020-05-20 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-21 7:50 ` Kevin Buettner
2020-05-21 12:40 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-21 14:23 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-21 15:09 ` Kevin Buettner
2020-05-21 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-21 17:06 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-13 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Test ability to access unwritten-to mmap data in core file Kevin Buettner
2020-05-20 16:46 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550ef44f-7b41-d999-fe58-b1fbc73f4403@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).