From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] Remote follow vfork
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55115851.6070201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426625788-4469-6-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com>
On 03/17/2015 08:56 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c b/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c
> index dc43e38..42c3ec5 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c
> @@ -1115,15 +1115,19 @@ prepare_resume_reply (char *buf, ptid_t ptid,
> {
> case TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED:
> case TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED:
> + case TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED:
> {
> struct thread_info *saved_thread;
> const char **regp;
> struct regcache *regcache;
>
> - if (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED && report_fork_events)
> + if ((status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED && report_fork_events)
> + || (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED
> + && report_vfork_events))
> {
> enum gdb_signal signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP;
> - const char *event = "xfork";
> + const char *event = (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED
> + ? "xfork" : "vfork");
>
> sprintf (buf, "T%02x%s:", signal, event);
> buf += strlen (buf);
> @@ -1245,6 +1249,15 @@ prepare_resume_reply (char *buf, ptid_t ptid,
> else
> sprintf (buf, "X%02x", status->value.sig);
> break;
> + case TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORK_DONE:
> + if (multi_process)
> + {
> + enum gdb_signal signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP;
> + const char *event = "vforkdone";
> +
Should only include vforkdone if report_vfork_events is true, I'd think.
> + sprintf (buf, "T%02x%s:;", signal, event);
> + }
> + break;
> default:
> error ("unhandled waitkind");
> break;
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/server.h b/gdb/gdbserver/server.h
> index 696a24e..09a5624 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/server.h
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/server.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ extern int disable_packet_qfThreadInfo;
> extern int run_once;
> extern int multi_process;
> extern int report_fork_events;
> +extern int report_vfork_events;
> extern int non_stop;
>
> /* True if the "swbreak+" feature is active. In that case, GDB wants
> diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
> index 899c7a2..d1ba62d 100644
> --- a/gdb/remote.c
> +++ b/gdb/remote.c
> @@ -4526,15 +4526,20 @@ remote_follow_fork (struct target_ops *ops, int follow_child,
> {
> struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
>
> + /* If fork events aren't supported, then return. We know that if
> + fork events are supported, then so are vfork events, since they
> + were both introduced in the same version of the linux kernel. */
"Linux", caps.
But this really doesn't make sense -- if we define different
qSupported features for fork and vfork, then we should check
them separately. We don't know (and shouldn't care) whether
we're debugging against a Linux target here. The packets/features
should work with other OSs.
> if (remote_fork_event_p (rs))
> {
> if (detach_fork && !follow_child)
> {
> ptid_t parent_ptid;
> ptid_t child_ptid;
> + enum target_waitkind kind;
>
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201501252151.t0PLo3jE018308@mx0b-0013c101.pphosted.com>
2015-01-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Remote fork events Breazeal, Don
2015-02-06 20:02 ` Breazeal, Don
2015-02-27 0:46 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] " Don Breazeal
2015-02-27 0:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/06] Identify remote fork event support Don Breazeal
2015-02-27 0:47 ` [PATCH v5 03/06] Extended-remote Linux follow fork Don Breazeal
2015-02-27 0:47 ` [PATCH v5 05/06] Remote follow vfork Don Breazeal
2015-02-27 0:47 ` [PATCH v5 02/06] Clone remote breakpoints Don Breazeal
2015-02-27 0:47 ` [PATCH v5 04/06] Arch-specific remote follow fork Don Breazeal
2015-02-27 7:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-27 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/06] Remote fork catch Don Breazeal
2015-03-02 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Remote fork events Pedro Alves
2015-03-02 20:18 ` [PATCH] Tighten gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp (was: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Remote fork events) Pedro Alves
2015-03-03 6:20 ` [PATCH] Tighten gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp Breazeal, Don
2015-03-03 15:01 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-17 21:18 ` Breazeal, Don
2015-03-18 19:37 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-17 20:56 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] Remote fork events Don Breazeal
2015-03-17 20:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] Identify remote fork event support Don Breazeal
2015-03-24 10:57 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-26 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 01/06] " Don Breazeal
2015-03-27 11:14 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] Extended-remote Linux follow fork Don Breazeal
2015-03-24 12:17 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 17:35 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] Arch-specific remote " Don Breazeal
2015-03-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] Clone remote breakpoints Don Breazeal
2015-03-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] Remote follow vfork Don Breazeal
2015-03-24 12:28 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-03-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] Remote fork catch Don Breazeal
2015-03-24 12:47 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55115851.6070201@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=donb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).