From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33334 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 22:27:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 33323 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 22:27:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:27:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3MMRTvm024725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:27:29 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3MMRRne013985; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:27:28 -0400 Message-ID: <5538204F.2030206@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop References: <1429267521-21047-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <5534EADB.2040201@gmail.com> <87bniirdxf.fsf@redhat.com> <553526D0.9030802@redhat.com> <86r3rdzzvc.fsf@gmail.com> <55366742.3020608@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55366742.3020608@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00853.txt.bz2 On 04/21/2015 04:05 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 21/04/15 08:47, Yao Qi wrote: >> Thanks for the clue. I'll dig it deeper. I'll read these patches >> today, if I don't see any new problems or questions, these patches are >> fine to me. > > Hi Pedro, > I've look at all this patch series, and sent out my questions to them. > Although I don't fully understand them, they are good to me in general, > given the test results we've go on different archs. Thanks Yao. I think I replied to all your questions. I'll be glad to try to clarify anything else that still might need it. I think I addressed all the comments I got so far, and I've tested on x86. Out of paranoia, I'm retesting on PPC64 and S/390 as well, though it's probably unnecessary as nothing major changed. Meanwhile, I pushed the changes to users/palves/all-stop-non-stop. Thanks, Pedro Alves