From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35048 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 15:09:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 35035 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2015 15:09:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 08 May 2015 15:09:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t48F8vDh028697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 May 2015 11:08:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t48F8tGN024851; Fri, 8 May 2015 11:08:56 -0400 Message-ID: <554CD186.9040903@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 15:09:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luis Machado , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR server/18081: gdbserver crashes when providing an unexisting binary References: <1428431386-16530-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <552581E9.2010400@ericsson.com> <554A5A04.8020604@redhat.com> <554CB1CA.4040203@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <554CB1CA.4040203@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 On 05/08/2015 01:53 PM, Luis Machado wrote: > On 05/06/2015 03:14 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 04/08/2015 08:30 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> >>> It's much better now, thanks! >> >> FYI, I've pushed this in now. > > For some reason the next test after that now fails and stops the > testsuite run. It's probably the setting of spawn_id. If so, it's the sort of thing that is only visible on a serial run, and I probably only tested a parallel run. I'll take a look. Thanks, Pedro Alves