From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81955 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 14:08:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 81941 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 14:08:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:08:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79603B812C; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4CE8crk031465; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:08:40 -0400 Message-ID: <55520966.2090105@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:08:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Benson CC: Doug Evans , gdb-patches , Philippe Waroquiers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make only user-specified executable filenames sticky References: <20150505151448.GA1417@blade.nx> <1430907977-30605-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <5551D7AD.8080500@redhat.com> <20150512111338.GA14968@blade.nx> <5551E0FF.8060408@redhat.com> <20150512134842.GA17599@blade.nx> In-Reply-To: <20150512134842.GA17599@blade.nx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2 On 05/12/2015 02:48 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 05/12/2015 12:13 PM, Gary Benson wrote: >>> Pedro Alves wrote: >>>> We don't have a command to get out of: >>>> >>>> "file wrong_program; attach PID" >>> >>> file wrong_program; file; attach PID >> >> That's different from what I was saying. That is, a command >> to fix things up _after_ the attach. > > Ah, ok, sorry. > > A different question: is there any reason that we should not > *always* set the executable file from whatever the running > program is? We need at least the section info, which may be missing in the running file. Thanks, Pedro Alves