Re: [PATCH] Fix problems with finishing a dummy function call on simulators.

[Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>]

On 06/09/2015 03:13 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 06/09/2015 07:10 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>>> Not exactly sure what to do here.  Maybe we should stop considering
>>> permanent and non-permanent breakpoints at the same address as
>>> duplicates.  That should result in GDB inserting the non-permanent
>>> one, I think.  Or we could get stop marking permanent breakpoints
>>> as always inserted, and let normal breakpoints insert on top of
>>> permanent breakpoints normally.  See also:
>>>    https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-03/msg00174.html
>>
>> That sounds a bit hacky.
>
> Can you clarify?  There are two suggestions above, in addition
> to a url showing even more ideas.  So I don't know what you're
> referring to.  :-)

Both the above and the mail sound like workaround ideas. You mentioned 
even more special casing in the mail. It is the amount of special casing 
that i'm afraid of.

Having more special cases feel like they defeat the purpose of having 
those permanent breakpoints if we have to IF our way through them. Am i 
missing something?