From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125430 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2015 09:57:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125417 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2015 09:57:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:57:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF8FC03F5; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t5F9v1vI003732; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:57:02 -0400 Message-ID: <557EA16D.5070706@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:57:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Cleanup some docs about memory write References: <1429127258-1033-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <1429127258-1033-3-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <555E19B1.3010504@redhat.com> <557B3043.1040302@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <557B3043.1040302@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On 06/12/2015 08:17 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > Actually it seems obvious now. I'll drop this part from the patch. If we want > to clarify the comments we should do it for all the functions of the interface > (in a separate patch). > > Well then, all that remains would be to fix that stale comment. Is it ok? OK. Thanks, Pedro Alves