From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 393 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2015 14:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 383 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2015 14:54:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:54:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924F0B8BC8; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t5FEsb40006370; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:54:38 -0400 Message-ID: <557EE72D.10503@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Palka , Eli Zaretskii CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Read $GDBHISTSIZE instead of $HISTSIZE References: <1432293831-23599-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx> <83vbfk4wxi.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 On 06/04/2015 04:30 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > Hmm, reading HISTSIZE as a last resort would reduce the inter-version > breakage a little, at least for users who today rely solely on > HISTSIZE (not ~/.gdbinit) to set their history size. This can be > done, I guess. I'd propose going ahead with the patch that ignores HISTSIZE and seeing if anyone notices/complains. Thanks, Pedro Alves