Re: Should this be on the blocker list for the 7.10 release?

[Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>]

On 15-07-07 03:20 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> This one (on top of the other) fixes this for me.  No
> testsuite regressions on x86_64 F20.
> 
> -----
> From 1290101d792c0e1d8c4e202cd7d900837db0ee84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 19:50:38 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] missing exit event
> 
> ---
>  gdb/linux-nat.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/linux-nat.c b/gdb/linux-nat.c
> index ea38ebb..281a270 100644
> --- a/gdb/linux-nat.c
> +++ b/gdb/linux-nat.c
> @@ -2275,6 +2275,20 @@ wait_lwp (struct lwp_info *lp)
>        /* Check if the thread has exited.  */
>        if (WIFEXITED (status) || WIFSIGNALED (status))
>  	{
> +	  if (ptid_get_pid (lp->ptid) == ptid_get_lwp (lp->ptid))
> +	    {
> +	      if (debug_linux_nat)
> +		fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "WL: Process %d exited.\n",
> +				    ptid_get_pid (lp->ptid));
> +
> +	      /* This is the leader exiting, it means the whole
> +		 process is gone.  Store the status to report to the
> +		 core.  Store it in the lp->waitstatus, because
> +		 W_EXITCODE(0,0) == 0.  */
> +	      store_waitstatus (&lp->waitstatus, status);
> +	      return 0;
> +	    }
> +
>  	  thread_dead = 1;
>  	  if (debug_linux_nat)
>  	    fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "WL: %s exited.\n",
> 

Indeed it looks good.  I'll work on the test.