From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127460 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 15:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127449 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2015 15:55:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:55:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ACB87C; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 15:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t74FtJms006587; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:55:19 -0400 Message-ID: <55C0E066.9040805@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:55:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iain Buclaw , Joel Brobecker CC: GDB Patches , Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH] bfd: Fix regression when building bfd on mingw32 References: <20150804154157.GA4777@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 On 08/04/2015 04:51 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > Actually, I got redirected to the binutils ml in the other thread, > it's already been submitted and pushed in. > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-07/msg00305.html > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=d6f1bafa2c05241b89c0303a9f6a2af89f51c39c > > So if you are having difficulties reproducing... I think this should be pushed to the 7.10 branch as well. Could you handle that? Thanks, Pedro Alves