From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51156 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2015 11:30:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51143 invoked by uid 89); 6 Aug 2015 11:30:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (207.82.80.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:30:40 +0000 Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-14-DhME_KVLRKiQTUQ6yUFxkQ-1; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:30:35 +0100 Received: from [10.2.207.36] ([10.1.2.79]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:30:34 +0100 Message-ID: <55C3455A.2080207@arm.com> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:30:00 -0000 From: Pierre Langlois User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , pierre.langlois@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove required field in agent's symbols References: <1438858101-35923-1-git-send-email-pierre.langlois@arm.com> <55C33ED1.7000106@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55C33ED1.7000106@redhat.com> X-MC-Unique: DhME_KVLRKiQTUQ6yUFxkQ-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On 06/08/15 12:02, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 08/06/2015 11:48 AM, Pierre Langlois wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> While looking at the in-process agent I noticed shared symbols between >> GDBserver and the IPA could be marked as . This field was nev= er >> set nor used so this patch removes it. >=20 > OK. Thanks Pedro, I've pushed this in. Pierre >=20 > Yeah, IIRC, that was meant for providing backwards compatibility when new > symbols are added. But we never did that. Given the tight coupling > between gdbserver and ipa, adding the field back if we ever need it is su= ch > a minor detail... >=20 > Thanks, > Pedro Alves >=20