From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99975 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2018 16:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99965 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2018 16:57:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:489, now!, now X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:57:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D593187179; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theo.uglyboxes.com (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91C087BB; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFA 0/4] Remove TYPE_TAG_NAME To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180417195125.14200-1-tom@tromey.com> From: Keith Seitz Message-ID: <55a92b20-3957-0faa-a238-f3889b39323f@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:57:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180417195125.14200-1-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 On 04/17/2018 12:51 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > As mentioned on the list, here is the series to remove TYPE_TAG_NAME. > > I think each patch is relatively self-explanatory, so I won't describe > them further here. Awesome! I've looked over all the patches, and I have only some minor comments on patch #3 to which I'll follow-up there. Thank you so much for doing this. This is something that I keep forgetting to look into -- for many years now! Keith