From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42327 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2015 17:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 42311 invoked by uid 89); 18 Nov 2015 17:53:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:53:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40914C00127E; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAIHrPBu008505; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:53:26 -0500 Message-ID: <564CBB15.7020209@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:53:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org CC: Simon Marchi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [C++] Drop -fpermissive hack, enable -Werror References: <1447864802-24016-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <564CB8EC.5000203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <564CB8EC.5000203@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2 Hi Yao, On 11/18/2015 05:44 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > I don't have objections to this patch set, just want to know what is > your plan to commit it. I was planning on committing it as soon as I got positive reviews, which seems like I have now. :-) Do you see a reason to hold it for now? My thinking is that most of the C++ problems are now sorted out, so the -fpermissive hack no longer helps that much. Note one can always explicitly configure with CXX="g++ -fpermissive" if necessary. > I'll fix C++ warnings and errors in ARM and AArch64 code. Thanks! -- Pedro Alves