From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122196 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2018 18:43:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122083 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jun 2018 18:43:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:7752860, yyyymmdd, yyyy-mm-dd X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:43:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D850401D781; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9667C50; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] "break LINENO/*ADDRESS", inline functions and "info break" output To: Joel Brobecker References: <77528608-be2c-5a21-e250-36e7d56ba950@redhat.com> <20180628145035.24713-2-palves@redhat.com> <20180628174203.GC2511@adacore.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <56677f78-3a52-33b6-83f0-5a83766c9bb0@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180628174203.GC2511@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00729.txt.bz2 On 06/28/2018 06:42 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves >> >> * gdb.opt/inline-break.exp (line number, address): Add "info >> break" tests. > > I went through the patch and it looks good. Great, thanks. I pushed in both patches now. Thanks, Pedro Alves