From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46360 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2015 12:56:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46345 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2015 12:56:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=highlighted X-HELO: usplmg20.ericsson.net Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (HELO usplmg20.ericsson.net) (198.24.6.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:56:04 +0000 Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 6A.3B.06940.18104765; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:52:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [142.133.110.95] (147.117.188.8) by smtp-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.188.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 07:55:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Support software single step and conditional breakpoints on ARM in GDBServer. To: , Yao Qi References: <1450361684-29536-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> From: Antoine Tremblay Message-ID: <5674025E.9050100@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450361684-29536-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2 On 12/17/2015 09:14 AM, Antoine Tremblay wrote: > In this v8: > > * Remove old patch 3. > * Patch 3: Use #define ARM_SIGRETURN, ARM_RT_SIGRETURN > * Other small style fixes highlighted in v7. > > Patch 1: is OK. > Patch 2: is OK. > Patch 3: Needs review ? I think is one is OK after all since the last version was and that the change to it was OK in last review. So I'll push the series in later today unless there's an objection. Thanks, Antoine