From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3889 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2016 13:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3872 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2016 13:34:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=711 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:34:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59FDC0C2345; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u11DYkLK006006; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:34:46 -0500 Message-ID: <56AF5EF5.4040307@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:34:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com, Yao Qi , keiths@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed) References: <20160201030638.GG4008@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20160201030638.GG4008@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 02/01/2016 03:06 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > PR19503 internal-error: linux_nat_resume: Assertion `lp != NULL' failed. > (Pedro seems to be on it already) I've been looking at it today. The assertion in question should be fixed, so I've closed this one. However, I've opened Bug 19548, for the breakpoint re-set issues discovered in that bug: [1] - https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19548 Unfortunately looks like a regression... I'm still looking. Thanks, Pedro Alves