From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17308 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2016 20:26:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17293 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2016 20:26:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=reviewing, it'll, itll, cells X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:26:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BC68F4FD; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 20:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u11KQB7v002542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:26:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] python/19506 -- gdb.Breakpoint address location regression To: Joel Brobecker References: <1453413926-24995-1-git-send-email-keiths@redhat.com> <20160126122256.GH5146@adacore.com> <56A81951.2030105@redhat.com> <20160201033247.GI4008@adacore.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Keith Seitz X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56AFBF63.4010404@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:26:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160201033247.GI4008@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On 01/31/2016 07:32 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > It sounds like a good idea, as I think it'll factorize the code. > In the grand scheme of things, the current situation is not all > that bad, though, so I wouldn't say that this absolutely needs > to be done ahead of everything else. > > So, what I would suggest is first push the current patch if > people agree with it. That way, we are covered for the release > branch. And then, if you have some time to look at this > enhancement before we release 7.11, then we can look at > possibly backporting it. > > Did anyone review the patch? Typically, Doug is the one reviewing > those patches, but I can take a look as well. I don't think I actually posted my patch. I wanted to test the waters first. :-) I'll get right to this before trying to combust brain cells on 19474. Keith