From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55021 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2016 23:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54596 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2016 23:02:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:02:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505C1C0B7E19; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u14N227U023814; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:02:03 -0500 Message-ID: <56B3D86A.8040901@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:02:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Breazeal CC: "Thomas Preud'homme" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [pushed][PATCH] Fix '-data-read-memory-bytes' typo/assertion References: <1447894382-1469-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <564F6040.7010702@codesourcery.com> <04e301d15e7f$a930f2f0$fb92d8d0$@foss.arm.com> <56B39716.9030103@codesourcery.com> <56B3D69E.3030205@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <56B3D69E.3030205@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On 02/04/2016 10:54 PM, Don Breazeal wrote: > > Pedro, you approved the original patch; OK to back-port this to the 7.10 > branch? OK. Thanks, Pedro Alves