From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41780 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2016 14:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41762 invoked by uid 89); 9 Feb 2016 14:18:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=nag, Normal, notifications, personal X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:18:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FA8A1470; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u19EIYQK009278; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:18:35 -0500 Message-ID: <56B9F53A.7020305@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:18:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Marchi , Sergio Durigan Junior , Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, keiths@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed) References: <20160201030638.GG4008@adacore.com> <20160207081230.GA20874@adacore.com> <87mvrajviz.fsf@redhat.com> <56B9F460.7080404@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <56B9F460.7080404@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 On 02/09/2016 02:14 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 16-02-09 12:35 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Today, Simon pushed a commit that caused a few regressions on Ada, on >> some builders. This is: >> >> > > I'll look into it right now. I did not receive anything from the > buildbot, is it normal? Yes, only build breakages get you a nag email. "Normal" testsuite regressions don't result in personal notifications, because the testsuite still trips on too many racy failures. Once the testing infrustructure handles racy tests more gracefully, and testing is more stable, I think we should enable personal nags, but not yet. Thanks, Pedro Alves