From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-129529-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 72084 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2016 15:29:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 72059 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2016 15:29:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:29:58 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3375FC0C2377;	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:29:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1CFTtX9026318;	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:29:56 -0500
Message-ID: <56BDFA73.9000001@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:29:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
CC: gbenson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression)
References: <1455200365-5270-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <1455200365-5270-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2

On 02/11/2016 02:19 PM, Luis Machado wrote:

> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2016-02-11  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* remote.c (remote_add_inferior): Guard block that can throw
> 	errors.

So the question is: why guard this call, and not the others?

E.g., I'd think that failing to find the executable in the sysroot
shouldn't error out of "attach" either.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves