From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: gbenson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BE0A1D.2070408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56BE038E.3060406@codesourcery.com>
On 02/12/2016 04:08 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> I did not exercise that, but did not discard it either. I was attempting
> to solve one problem at a time. There may be a failure there too.
I matters to determine where the TRY/CATCH should go, or even whether
the fix should be to not throw in the first place.
Like, with:
(gdb) define foo
> attach PID
> info threads
> end
(gdb) foo
should failing to load the executable error out before
reaching "info threads", or continue.
I think it should not error out, like we don't error out
if the target doesn't support target_pid_to_exec_file
at all.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-12 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 14:19 Luis Machado
2016-02-11 16:35 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-11 17:06 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-11 17:31 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-11 17:42 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-12 10:31 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-12 10:59 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-12 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-17 13:53 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-17 14:40 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-17 17:02 ` [OB PATCH] Add missing cleanup in exec_file_locate_attach Gary Benson
2016-02-17 17:05 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-17 18:11 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-18 9:54 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-18 17:05 ` [PATCH] Fix logic " Gary Benson
2016-02-18 17:28 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-19 10:24 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-19 10:33 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-19 11:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Gary Benson
2016-02-19 15:38 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 10:40 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-22 11:37 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 13:51 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-22 22:00 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 22:50 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-22 23:00 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 0:04 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-23 0:13 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 0:16 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-23 11:27 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-23 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 12:15 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-23 12:20 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-23 11:55 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-24 11:56 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-12 15:29 ` [PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression) Pedro Alves
2016-02-12 16:08 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-12 16:36 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-02-12 17:31 ` Luis Machado
2016-02-17 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-18 12:30 ` Gary Benson
2016-02-18 12:40 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BE0A1D.2070408@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gbenson@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).