public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Tsutomu Seki <sekiriki@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>,
	       Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] supports IPv6 only remote target
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E1A467.5060509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83h9hg9xrj.fsf@gnu.org>

On 02/10/2016 07:21 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Do we care about W2K support at this point?  AFAIK, quite a few
> MinGW64 headers require and set _WIN32_WINNT to a value that will
> exclude W2K anyway.
> 
> I suggest to wait for Pedro or Joel to chime in on this issue.

I wouldn't care about W2K at this point.

gnulib has a getaddrinfo module, but I think that pulls in gnulib's 
select replacement, which is a big problem for gdb.  So if we cared
about old hosts that don't support getaddrinfo, it'd have to be based
on #ifdef.  But, I believe that the only remaining such systems
would be old Windows hosts, since we dropped support for several old
Unix hosts in 7.10/7.11.  As such, I think we can just use getaddrinfo
unconditionally.

I think this is at least the 3rd IPv6 patch posted over the years.
It's about time we merge some in.  I've added a couple folks to
CC who proposed this before.

It'd be useful to review past discussions, and see if
there's something there we should consider.  See e.g.:

  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-02/msg00254.html

AFAICS, Tsutomu's patch doesn't cycle through available
addresses.  Should it?

Tsutomu, do you have an FSF copyright assignment?

Paul, do you have an FSF copyright assignment?

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-09 13:50 Tsutomu Seki
2016-02-09 17:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-10 11:43   ` Tsutomu Seki
2016-02-10 18:14     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-10 18:55       ` Tsutomu Seki
2016-02-10 19:22         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-10 16:44           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-03-10 21:20             ` Paul Fertser
2016-03-11  1:42               ` Tsutomu Seki
2016-03-11 10:25                 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-10 19:21                   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-04-10 20:05                     ` Paul Fertser
2018-04-11  2:26                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-04-11 12:19                       ` Tsutomu Seki
2018-04-11 16:18                         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-03-11 15:52             ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E1A467.5060509@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=fercerpav@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=sekiriki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).