From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117283 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2016 10:25:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117271 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2016 10:25:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:343, legally X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1336E3F3A6; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2BAPjsB013847; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:25:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] supports IPv6 only remote target To: Tsutomu Seki , Paul Fertser References: <831t8ldc80.fsf@gnu.org> <83oaboa0x5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9hg9xrj.fsf@gnu.org> <56E1A467.5060509@redhat.com> <20160310212022.GO7461@home.paul.comp> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <56E29D29.7010808@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On 03/11/2016 01:42 AM, Tsutomu Seki wrote: > Hi Pedro, > >> Tsutomu, do you have an FSF copyright assignment? > > No, I don't. The patch is larger than we could consider "not legally significant", so we will need one in order to accept it. I'll follow up on that off list. Thanks, Pedro Alves