On 2/6/23 15:01, Lancelot Six wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for, letting us know. I am preparing a patch to fix this (skip > the tests if the amd-dbgapi support is not built in or if the hiccc > compiler for amdgpu is not available). > > I hope to send this tomorrow. > Thanks for working on this. FWIW, I just tried the same test-case on openSUSE Tumbleweed, and ran into some kind of "no usable compiler found" message. After adding c++ to the compile flags, I ran into the same error as described below. Thanks, - Tom > Best > Lancelot > > Le 6 février 2023 11:47:55 GMT+00:00, Tom de Vries > a écrit : > > On 2/2/23 16:08, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: > >> On 1/25/23 12:03, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: >>> On 1/5/23 15:02, Simon Marchi wrote: >>>> This is the v2 of: >>>> >>>> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20221206135729.3937767-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com/ >>>> >>>> I pushed patches 5, 7, 8 and 9, since I considered them good chances even >>>> outside of this series. >>>> >>>> Most other preparatory patches have been reviewed and LGTM'ed by Andrew >>>> Burgess, but they are not really useful on their own, so they are still >>>> in this series. There are no changes in them, except a typo fix in >>>> patch 3. >>>> >>>> The only preparatory patch which was not reviewed is "gdb/solib-svr4: >>>> don't disable probes interface if probe not found". >>> Ping. >>> >>> I plan to push the series in a week from now, if there are no more >>> comments on this. Note that this code has been heavily scrutinized by >>> Pedro and Lancelot, so I am confident that it is in good shape already. >>> >>> Simon >> I pushed the series. >> >> Simon > > > Hi, > > as I mentioned earlier to Lancelot off-list, I'm now seeing: > > ... > > Running /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.rocm/simple.exp ... > gdb compile failed, > /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.rocm/simple.cpp:18:10: fatal > error: hip/hip_runtime.h: No such file or directory > #include "hip/hip_runtime.h" >          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > compilation terminated. > ... > > Thanks, > > - Tom >