From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56501 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2016 18:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56483 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jul 2016 18:24:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*pedro X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:24:23 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1bJ36y-0001Yr-Tn from Don_Breazeal@mentor.com ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:24:20 -0700 Received: from [172.30.3.218] (147.34.91.1) by SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:24:20 -0700 Subject: [pushed] Re: [PATCH v3] Optimize memory_xfer_partial for remote To: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <1467326424-139115-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <339ce1ec-0551-a44f-9f39-c7e0f378a250@palves.net> From: Don Breazeal Message-ID: <5776B54F.1010809@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <339ce1ec-0551-a44f-9f39-c7e0f378a250@palves.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 On 6/30/2016 4:37 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 06/30/2016 11:40 PM, Don Breazeal wrote: >> Hi Pedro, >> Here is v3 of the patch. Differences from v2 include returning >> ULONGEST_MAX instead of 4096 from the default target function >> and using TARGET_DEFAULT_RETURN instead of TARGET_DEFAULT_FUNCTION >> in the definition of to_get_memory_xfer_limit. >> >> I re-ran the testsuite with native and native-gdbserver and saw no >> regressions. I also verified that the behavior of the memory transfers >> was as expected for the remote and native targets. >> >> Does this one look good-to-go? > > Yes, looks good. > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves > I've pushed this in. Thanks --Don