From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdbsupport: fix scoped_debug_start_end's move constructor
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:23:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5905d51d-bc33-b801-12c4-4d110ff7c5d5@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k020d9x2.fsf@tromey.com>
On 1/5/23 15:05, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
>>> + scoped_debug_start_end (scoped_debug_start_end &&other)
>>> + : m_debug_enabled (other.m_debug_enabled),
>>> + m_module (other.m_module),
>>> + m_func (other.m_func),
>>> + m_end_prefix (other.m_end_prefix),
>>> + m_msg (other.m_msg),
>
> Simon> Just found this nit... not that it changes anything (because this ctor
> Simon> isn't called in practice), but we should std::move m_msg. I'll change
> Simon> it locally.
>
> I think it's also fine to just leave it as-is.
>
> Simon> Well, we could std::move all fields, but it would be a bit verbose.
>
> If we think we may need this kind of behavior again, one way would be a
> sort of "move token" object that wraps a bool, and that sets the bool on
> construction and clears it on move. Then scoped_debug_start_end could
> just use the default move constructor again, and check the token's value
> in its destructor.
Interesting, I'll keep this in mind. I think it could apply to some
scoped_restore_* objects that have global side effects, that we want to
be movable, because we want to be able to have functions that return
them.
> Probably overkill for just the one case. I think your patch is ok.
Ok, thanks, will push.
Simon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-05 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 21:22 Simon Marchi
2023-01-04 22:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-05 20:05 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-05 20:23 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5905d51d-bc33-b801-12c4-4d110ff7c5d5@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).