From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71EA03857805 for ; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:38:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 71EA03857805 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id k19so6748014wrd.8 for ; Mon, 30 May 2022 07:38:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VwKYDzdTAw4hkgvIL6t6a0Oa9Jv0z3TOO5flf9bsimA=; b=bQjoUYeKJh5ZZlstmoBrdVMULEiqUepStvEA9npPG+TPoLGzIpX1baWK8m2xcnAz9Y q2H7dmmTIjduALIs3YjC8weldVm2jg32iiGz6kBjHxWzjU5XzXHfOhVyQAmik98t3fel kGvAAkwmCNToz8AZ/Dm02YLaugxX+MQdki1yhl/bPzN2LeJ4IkgeYV24MYsfl74xmTvv 4ozNFQiZcgLC4ZE4IZ6HRHOhAZChsjjpI7BEKPAeCkYGK1PfNwQ0Z/yQPG+P0LEzyOak 4BwUmNcRU88cAiCasr3WfqHY0tgZhjQKzbodKWq0OwUt5hl/xPd98IIyxLmbSZk5kivR wyXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313XBC4nQrUqdNuqMhvHTHEEqBvnCPFaxXhjLgS7AhOErye3Fax OcGcdY4xhSzz5k2FoN3sb1UAIkn8Pyc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxReH2JwI4pBnn8aP1GsmJcn0og1T+84FZo3ubebEX1vwjFff2Y2NmZKkxM8jHXXePReqMBsg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:47cc:0:b0:20f:e246:d7d with SMTP id o12-20020a5d47cc000000b0020fe2460d7dmr32527034wrc.2.1653921527217; Mon, 30 May 2022 07:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:8a0:f924:2600:209d:85e2:409e:8726? ([2001:8a0:f924:2600:209d:85e2:409e:8726]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h9-20020a7bc929000000b003974a3af623sm10726658wml.17.2022.05.30.07.38.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 May 2022 07:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <59d6bd97-3f16-2bb7-f333-46769a0d5f27@palves.net> Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 15:38:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gdb/manual: Introduce location specs Content-Language: en-US To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220526194250.2310460-1-pedro@palves.net> <8335gvnjrw.fsf@gnu.org> <956e1fbd-5f03-c021-c390-82e1cf3493b5@palves.net> <83wne7m0ri.fsf@gnu.org> <2bc9b5c9-879a-2848-16f4-6cfd796563a8@palves.net> <83sfounaqw.fsf@gnu.org> <02a46873-35dc-0d9c-1890-292b807d9484@palves.net> <83pmjyn8as.fsf@gnu.org> <113bd07c-3bfe-0780-50a9-4c41c84942e9@palves.net> <83mtf2n6lw.fsf@gnu.org> <266eba78-e6c7-c72a-4820-bbbabe37ac04@palves.net> <837d66m7au.fsf@gnu.org> From: Pedro Alves In-Reply-To: <837d66m7au.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:38:50 -0000 On 2022-05-28 08:43, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 20:30:06 +0100 >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> From: Pedro Alves >> >> On 2022-05-27 20:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>> What I was talking about was not about using the location specs, it >>> was about explaining what it is and how it differs from the code >>> location. I think we have to explain the terminology before we use >>> it, since it is not entirely trivial. >> >> OK, here's what I added on top of v4, locally. WDYT? > > LGTM, so I think this can go in, given the results of my review of the > rest of the patch (see my other message) are taken care of. Great, thanks! I've addressed your review in the other email and pushed the result. I'll send a detailed reply to your other message after sending this one.