RE: Ping: [PATCH v2] x86-64: fix ZMM register state tracking

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>]

>>> On 07.11.18 at 10:07, <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> wrote:
>>  On 2018-10-29 06:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>>> On 10.10.18 at 17:12,  wrote:
>> >> The three AVX512 state components are entirely independent - one
>> >> being in its "init state" has no implication whatsoever on either of
>> >> the other two. Fully separate X86_XSTATE_ZMM_H and X86_XSTATE_ZMM
>> >> handling, to prevent upper halves of the upper 16 ZMM registers to
>> >> display as if they were zero (when they aren't) after e.g.
>> >> VZEROALL/VZEROUPPER.
>> >>
>> >> gdb/
>> >> 2018-10-10  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> >>
>> >> 	* i387-tdep.c (i387_supply_xsave): Split handling of
>> >> 	X86_XSTATE_ZMM_H and X86_XSTATE_ZMM.
>> >> 	(i387_collect_xsave): Likewise.
>> >>
>> >> gdb/testsuite/
>> >> 2018-10-10  Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
>> >>
>> >> 	* testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.c,
>> >> 	testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp: Add 7th test.
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> v2: Attach comments to zmm_endlo_regnum declarations. Add testcase
>> >>     provided by Simon.
>> 
>> The testcase obviously LGTM.  I will let Markus approve the other changes.
> 
> The code already looked good to me in v1.  Thanks for adding comments.

So can I translate this into an ack for me to commit the change?
Or else, who would be the one to give the go-ahead?

Jan