From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16026385700C for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:03:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 16026385700C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A0751E009; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:03:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Propose GDB 10 branch this Fri-Sun (Sep 11-13) [2020-09-05 Update] To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey References: <20200905205318.GA30158@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <65077bc0-b119-bf26-0126-92caab61e389@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:03:33 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200905205318.GA30158@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:03:35 -0000 On 2020-09-05 4:53 p.m., Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Below is another status update before branching. We're almost there, > and if all goes well, I propose we create the branch during the weekend > of Fri-Sun Sep 11-13, immediately followed by creating the first > prerelease. I found and filed this: skip compares pattern against mangled name https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26598 Probably not a blocker for the branch, since a fix can easily be backported. But it should be a blocker for the release, given that it was introduced since the last release, so we have the opportunity to fix it before it is released in the wild. Simon