public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gdb/python: handle saving user registers in a frame unwinder
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:09:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6567d752-3eef-9782-106d-3daf008c0a00@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607180131.dtq5ejhffpigicue@Plymouth>

> Hi,
> 
> Actually, this is mentioned in the PEP-8[1][2], which states in the
> “Programming Recommandations” section:
> 
>     Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or
> 		is not, never the equality operators.
> 
> This leads me to an annex question. Given that I still lack a lot of
> experience with the overall codebase, I tend to pick this kind of small
> stylistic details more easily than design and logic problems.  I do not
> always point out those I see when I read the ML, but I can totally
> understand those isolated stylistic comments can be considered as noise.
> If so, please let me know!

I think it's perfectly OK.  That's how you begin and then you grow from
there, as your understanding of how things interact in the code base
grows.  I am pretty sure the first patches I reviewed were pointing out
small and easy things.

And even if someone has more experience in GDB, they can still learn
from what you mentioned above.

>>     $ flake8 testsuite/gdb.python/py-unwind-user-regs.py
>>     testsuite/gdb.python/py-unwind-user-regs.py:52:18: E711 comparison to None should be 'if cond is None:'
>>     testsuite/gdb.python/py-unwind-user-regs.py:55:17: E711 comparison to None should be 'if cond is None:'
> 
> I am currently running the testsuite against a patch that fixes those I
> found. I’ll try to post it later tonight.

Great, thanks!

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-07 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-29 20:57 [PATCH 0/5] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] gdb/python: handle saving user registers in a frame unwinder Andrew Burgess
2021-06-07 14:50   ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-07 16:10     ` Andrew Burgess
2021-06-07 20:38       ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-07 17:07   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-06-07 17:20     ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-07 18:01       ` Lancelot SIX
2021-06-07 18:09         ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2021-06-07 20:12         ` Andrew Burgess
2021-06-21 19:41   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] gdb/python: move PyLong_From* calls into py-utils.c Andrew Burgess
2021-06-07 14:53   ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-21 19:42     ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] gdb/python: add PendingFrame.level and Frame.level methods Andrew Burgess
2021-05-30  5:55   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-30 18:34   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-30 18:54     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-07 14:57   ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-21 19:42   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] gdb: remove VALUE_FRAME_ID Andrew Burgess
2021-06-21 19:46 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Andrew Burgess
2021-06-21 19:46   ` [PATCHv2 1/2] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-07-05 11:39     ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-05 14:14       ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-21 19:46   ` [PATCHv2 2/2] gdb: remove VALUE_FRAME_ID Andrew Burgess
2021-06-29 17:53     ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-30 15:18       ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-05 14:22         ` Simon Marchi
2021-07-20  9:10   ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Andrew Burgess
2021-07-20  9:10     ` [PATCHv3 1/2] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-07-20  9:10     ` [PATCHv3 2/2] gdb: remove VALUE_FRAME_ID Andrew Burgess
2021-07-20 21:59     ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Simon Marchi
2021-07-26 11:11       ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-26 13:57         ` Simon Marchi
2021-07-27 10:06           ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-27 10:10     ` [PATCHv4] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-08-09 15:41       ` [PATCHv5] " Andrew Burgess
2021-08-23  9:41         ` Andrew Burgess
2021-08-23 10:26           ` Pedro Alves
2021-08-23 12:31             ` Andrew Burgess
2021-09-20 10:04               ` Andrew Burgess
2021-09-20 12:24         ` Pedro Alves
2021-09-21 13:52           ` Andrew Burgess
2021-09-21 13:54         ` [PATCHv6] " Andrew Burgess
2021-09-22 14:14           ` Simon Marchi
2021-09-22 16:46             ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6567d752-3eef-9782-106d-3daf008c0a00@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).