From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gdb/python: handle saving user registers in a frame unwinder
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:09:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6567d752-3eef-9782-106d-3daf008c0a00@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607180131.dtq5ejhffpigicue@Plymouth>
> Hi,
>
> Actually, this is mentioned in the PEP-8[1][2], which states in the
> “Programming Recommandations” section:
>
> Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or
> is not, never the equality operators.
>
> This leads me to an annex question. Given that I still lack a lot of
> experience with the overall codebase, I tend to pick this kind of small
> stylistic details more easily than design and logic problems. I do not
> always point out those I see when I read the ML, but I can totally
> understand those isolated stylistic comments can be considered as noise.
> If so, please let me know!
I think it's perfectly OK. That's how you begin and then you grow from
there, as your understanding of how things interact in the code base
grows. I am pretty sure the first patches I reviewed were pointing out
small and easy things.
And even if someone has more experience in GDB, they can still learn
from what you mentioned above.
>> $ flake8 testsuite/gdb.python/py-unwind-user-regs.py
>> testsuite/gdb.python/py-unwind-user-regs.py:52:18: E711 comparison to None should be 'if cond is None:'
>> testsuite/gdb.python/py-unwind-user-regs.py:55:17: E711 comparison to None should be 'if cond is None:'
>
> I am currently running the testsuite against a patch that fixes those I
> found. I’ll try to post it later tonight.
Great, thanks!
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-29 20:57 [PATCH 0/5] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] gdb/python: handle saving user registers in a frame unwinder Andrew Burgess
2021-06-07 14:50 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-07 16:10 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-06-07 20:38 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-07 17:07 ` Lancelot SIX
2021-06-07 17:20 ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-07 18:01 ` Lancelot SIX
2021-06-07 18:09 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2021-06-07 20:12 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-06-21 19:41 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] gdb/python: move PyLong_From* calls into py-utils.c Andrew Burgess
2021-06-07 14:53 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-21 19:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] gdb/python: add PendingFrame.level and Frame.level methods Andrew Burgess
2021-05-30 5:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-30 18:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-30 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-07 14:57 ` Tom Tromey
2021-06-21 19:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-05-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] gdb: remove VALUE_FRAME_ID Andrew Burgess
2021-06-21 19:46 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Andrew Burgess
2021-06-21 19:46 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-07-05 11:39 ` Pedro Alves
2021-07-05 14:14 ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-21 19:46 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] gdb: remove VALUE_FRAME_ID Andrew Burgess
2021-06-29 17:53 ` Simon Marchi
2021-06-30 15:18 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-05 14:22 ` Simon Marchi
2021-07-20 9:10 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Andrew Burgess
2021-07-20 9:10 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-07-20 9:10 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] gdb: remove VALUE_FRAME_ID Andrew Burgess
2021-07-20 21:59 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Fix for an assertion when unwinding with inline frames Simon Marchi
2021-07-26 11:11 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-26 13:57 ` Simon Marchi
2021-07-27 10:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-27 10:10 ` [PATCHv4] gdb: prevent an assertion when computing the frame_id for an inline frame Andrew Burgess
2021-08-09 15:41 ` [PATCHv5] " Andrew Burgess
2021-08-23 9:41 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-08-23 10:26 ` Pedro Alves
2021-08-23 12:31 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-09-20 10:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-09-20 12:24 ` Pedro Alves
2021-09-21 13:52 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-09-21 13:54 ` [PATCHv6] " Andrew Burgess
2021-09-22 14:14 ` Simon Marchi
2021-09-22 16:46 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6567d752-3eef-9782-106d-3daf008c0a00@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).