Re: [PATCH] PowerPC, fix gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-bkpt.exp and gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp

[Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>]

On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 17:56 +0000, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > I have updated the patch, below.  If you could take a quick look
> > and
> > make sure it works on your system that would be great.  Assuming it
> > is
> > OK, hopefully we can get a maintainer to bless it and we will get
> > the
> > patch committed.
> 
> This approach makes sense to me.  The one thing that may not be
> quite optimal is that having finish-reverse-bkpt.exp use the same
> source file as finish-reverse.exp starts looking to be more trouble
> than it may be worth.
> 
> Would it make sense to create a new finish-reverse-bkpt.c file
> that contains just the stripped-down test case (using the function
> pointer) required to do the "break *callee" test?
> 
> Same for next-reverse-bpkt-over-sr.exp vs. step-reverse.c.

Splitting the tests off to their own source file would be fine.  I will
work on that.  Thanks for the review.

                       Carl