From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
Gary Benson via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [OB PATCH] Build two gdb.cp testcases with -Wno-unused-comparison
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 19:31:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68fd1b3e-10ae-8f1d-b96d-f35ce7ae3037@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mu5qaa2b.fsf@tromey.com>
On 5/29/20 7:08 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Gary" == Gary Benson via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
> Gary> +if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile} \
> Gary> + {debug c++ additional_flags=-Wno-unused-comparison}] } {
>
> Won't this cause build (and therefore test) failures if the compiler
> does not accept this option?
I think that by design, while GCC errors out about unknown -Wfoo warnings,
it ignores -Wno-foo, so that you can disable newer warnings without worrying
about older compilers:
$ gcc main.c -o main -g3 -O0 -Wfoo
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wfoo’
$ gcc main.c -o main -g3 -O0 -Wno-foo
However, Clang seems to output a warning in either case:
$ clang main.c -o main -g3 -O0 -Wfoo
warning: unknown warning option '-Wfoo' [-Wunknown-warning-option]
1 warning generated.
$ clang main.c -o main -g3 -O0 -Wno-foo
warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-foo' [-Wunknown-warning-option]
1 warning generated.
(This was clang 5.0.2)
So that new option can break tests with older Clangs that don't
know about the option. I guess to prevent this sort of thing going
forward, we could make gcc_compile always add -Wno-unknown-warning-option
to the build flags. I don't know when was that option added to Clang,
but maybe it's ancient enough.
I don't know about other compilers, though.
> I wonder if there's a way to fix the warning in the C++ source file
> instead.
Yeah, me too. Though the idea above could be helpful for other
tests/cases.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 13:03 Gary Benson
2020-05-29 18:08 ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-29 18:31 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2020-06-16 12:42 ` Gary Benson
2020-06-16 15:11 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-17 17:29 ` Gary Benson
2020-06-17 19:53 ` [PATCH] W/ Clang, compile C/C++ testcases with -Wno-unknown-warning-option Pedro Alves
2020-06-18 16:18 ` Gary Benson
2020-06-24 22:26 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-02 10:02 ` Gary Benson
2020-06-16 12:38 ` [OB PATCH] Build two gdb.cp testcases with -Wno-unused-comparison Gary Benson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68fd1b3e-10ae-8f1d-b96d-f35ce7ae3037@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).