From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove relational operators from common/offset-type.h
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 03:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <692dbc7e4c7e6f1f6ceccf9fb5711880@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181029211401.21602-1-sergiodj@redhat.com>
On 2018-10-29 17:14, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> This patch is a follow-up of:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-10/msg00601.html
>
> It removes the declaration of the relational operators for
> common/offset-type.h. As it turns out, these overloads are not being
> used when a new offset type is declared, because, according to Pedro
> Alves:
>
> I think the functions aren't called because they are templates, and
> thus the built-in (non-template) versions take precedence. If you
> make them non-templates, then they should be called. But, the
> built-ins are fine, so yeah, we can just remove the custom
> definitions.
>
> The patch also adjusts the comments on the code.
>
> No regressions introduced.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 2018-10-29 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>
> * common/offset-type.h (DEFINE_OFFSET_REL_OP): Delete.
> Adjust comments.
Thanks, LGTM.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-30 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-25 21:10 [PATCH] Fix thinko on common/offset-type.h (compare 'lhs' against 'rhs') Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-26 4:03 ` Kevin Buettner
2018-10-26 16:30 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-26 16:08 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-26 16:29 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-26 18:23 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-29 20:11 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-29 20:14 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-29 21:14 ` [PATCH] Remove relational operators from common/offset-type.h Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-30 3:17 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-10-30 3:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=692dbc7e4c7e6f1f6ceccf9fb5711880@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).