public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Change calculation of frame_id by amd64 epilogue unwinder
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:59:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6975b747-e4fd-ca3c-1b89-d65b51d44d1f@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c39ef3a9-1fbf-0ded-7959-75cf523c1a8e@simark.ca>

On 10/25/22 09:44, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 10/5/22 06:38, Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> When GDB is stopped at a ret instruction and no debug information is
>> available for unwinding, GDB defaults to the amd64 epilogue unwinder, to
>> be able to generate a decent backtrace. However, when calculating the
>> frame id, the epilogue unwinder generates information as if the return
>> instruction was the whole frame.
>>
>> This was an issue especially when attempting to reverse debug, as GDB
>> would place a step_resume_breakpoint from the epilogue of a function if
>> we were to attempt to skip that function, and this breakpoint should
>> ideally have the current function's frame_id to avoid other problems
>> such as PR record/16678.
>>
>> This commit changes the frame_id calculation for the amd64 epilogue,
>> so that it is always the same as the dwarf2 unwinder's frame_id.
>>
>> It also adds a test to confirm that the frame_id will be the same,
>> regardless of using the epilogue unwinder or not, thanks to Andrew
>> Burgess.
>>
>> Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  gdb/amd64-tdep.c                              |  10 +-
>>  .../gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn-foo.c        |  22 +++
>>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.c  |  25 +++
>>  .../gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp          | 154 ++++++++++++++++++/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.6
>>  4 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn-foo.c
>>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.c
>>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp
> 
> Hi Bruno,
> 
> On Ubuntu 22.04, I can get this new test to fail quite reliably with:
> 
>     $ taskset -c 1 make check TESTS="gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver"
> 
> Can you give it a try?
> 
> Simon

Actually, I took the time to look into it, it turns out the problem is
simple.  Here's a patch below.


From 7090bf701b2f1cca89985ea1b45b0a2e3859e19e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:50:56 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make sure to consume the prompt in
 gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp

This test fails quite reliably for me when ran as:

    $ taskset -c 1 make check TESTS="gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver"

or more simply:

    $ make check-read1 TESTS="gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp"

The problem is that the that grabs the frame id from "maint print
frame-id" does not consume the prompt.  Well, it does sometimes due to
the trailing .*, but not always.  If the prompt is not consumed, the
following tests get confused:

    FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at *foo
    FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: disassemble foo
    FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: get $sp and frame base in foo: get hexadecimal valueof "$sp"

Use -wrap to make gdb_test_multiple consume the prompt.

While at it, remove the bit that consumes the command name and do
exp_continue, it's not really necessary.  And for consistency, do the
same changes to the gdb_test_multiple that consumes the stack address,
although that one was fine, it did consume the prompt explicitly.

Change-Id: I2b7328c8844c7e98921ea494c4c05107162619fc
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp
index faa6a1a3f064..3b48805cff83 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp
@@ -44,11 +44,7 @@ proc get_sp_and_fba { testname } {

 	set fba ""
 	gdb_test_multiple "info frame" "" {
-	    -re "^info frame\r\n" {
-		exp_continue
-	    }
-
-	    -re "^Stack level ${::decimal}, frame at ($::hex):\r\n.*$::gdb_prompt $" {
+	    -re -wrap ".*Stack level ${::decimal}, frame at ($::hex):.*" {
 		set fba $expect_out(1,string)
 	    }
 	}
@@ -62,11 +58,7 @@ proc get_sp_and_fba { testname } {
 proc get_fid { } {
     set fid ""
     gdb_test_multiple "maint print frame-id" "" {
-	-re "^maint print frame-id\r\n" {
-	    exp_continue
-	}
-
-	-re "^frame-id for frame #${::decimal}: (\[^\r\n\]+).*" {
+	-re -wrap ".*frame-id for frame #${::decimal}: (.*)" {
 	    set fid $expect_out(1,string)
 	}
     }
-- 
2.38.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-05 10:38 [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix reverse nexting over recursions Bruno Larsen
2022-10-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] Change calculation of frame_id by amd64 epilogue unwinder Bruno Larsen
2022-10-25 13:44   ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-25 13:51     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-25 13:59     ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2022-10-25 14:13       ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-25 14:37         ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-05 10:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] gdb/reverse: Fix stepping over recursive functions Bruno Larsen
2022-10-25 14:55   ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-25 16:22     ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-02 17:03     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-02 17:46       ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-03  9:08         ` [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add KFAILs to gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp Bruno Larsen
2022-11-03 13:06           ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-03 14:30             ` [PATCHv2] " Bruno Larsen
2022-11-03 16:59               ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-04 11:06                 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-20  7:42 ` [PING][PATCH v4 0/2] Fix reverse nexting over recursions Bruno Larsen
2022-10-20 18:56   ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-21 10:50     ` Bruno Larsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6975b747-e4fd-ca3c-1b89-d65b51d44d1f@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).