From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125124 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2018 13:04:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125101 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2018 13:04:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:04:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F1BDFE5; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7098A2027EA4; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Logical short circuiting with argument lists To: Tom Tromey , Richard Bunt References: <79494820-f795-ad3c-8546-0ad288cd05b0@arm.com> <87mustueua.fsf@tromey.com> <2fd31db3-e0f7-262b-6b30-bd7a78cbabbf@arm.com> <87pnxjj688.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, nd@arm.com From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <6975e212-9903-2f20-d272-f20d87673504@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pnxjj688.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 On 09/12/2018 12:38 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Rich> However, if I had used a space between the array symbol name > Rich> and the parenthesizes this would have been a problem. This is > Rich> useful to know. > > Yeah. A bit subtle for my taste, I feel certain I'll break this rule by > accident. I've extended the wiki section to hopefully clarify things and make it more obvious with an example. Please take a look: https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook#Do_not_use_.22tail_parentheses.22_on_test_messages Thanks, Pedro Alves