From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127661 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2019 19:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115975 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2019 19:58:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:58:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27200A53C9; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCFB5E1BA; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Remove some ALL_* iteration macros To: Tom Tromey References: <20181125165439.13773-1-tom@tromey.com> <4406ff6a-975d-0db7-747c-27c7edda8bdb@simark.ca> <87y381v2iu.fsf@tromey.com> <87h8el1raa.fsf@tromey.com> <1565370d-7094-ab55-26ea-b4efa92ac139@redhat.com> <87imywpen5.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <69f91517-9b76-19fc-76fc-eca5fc690f67@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87imywpen5.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 On 01/10/2019 06:10 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Pedro> OOC, did you consider following that, and decided again? > Pedro> No need to redo the series or anything, I'm just curious, > Pedro> since I would have taken a different choice. > > I didn't even think of it. I will add this to my to-do list, it does > look better. > > Also maybe I next_adapter should be renamed to something better, at > least having the word "range" in it? > Yeah. Thanks, Pedro Alves